Arrow of time
Arrow of time

My brief experience with SSDs on the desktop

Share Tweet Share

This is the first time I've tried to used an SSD on a desktop, and it was primarily to try …

This is the first time I've tried to used an SSD on a desktop, and it was primarily to try to speed up Windows booting and application start. In short: don't bother.


I experimentally bought a small but relatively high-end SSD: Mushkin 60 GB Deluxe, with the Sandforce SF-1200 controller, to be used as the OS disk drive. I could have bought a bigger one but really didn't wan't to experiment too much on my own money :)

About the device itself, I have mixed impressions:

  1. The raw performance numbers are as advertised. Running the benchmarks I really do get the impressive 250+ MB/s and high IOPS numbers
  2. On the other hand, I apparently had compatibility problems (or the device was more broken than I thought): it took a long time to initialize after a cold boot - the BIOS usually couldn't detect it before rebooting the machine again
  3. "IRL" performance in Windows was - disappointing. Yes, it was faster (especially in the benchmarks, as I said) but not where I wanted it to be - in starting and running applications. I got nowhere near the responsiveness I thought I would get with the thousands of IOPS the machine is capable of. While in FreeBSD it's ridiculously obvious with seek-intensive operations (like pkg_info...), here it was a surprisingly "meh" experience. Faster: yes, but "actually visibly fast" - no.

Finally, the device apparently died after a few days of use so it kind of settled the things for me. I don't think it actually physically died, but its firmware got wedged so that it doesn't respond to inquiry any more, and as so it cannot be detected by the BIOS any more. Effectively, it's dead either way.

I'm planning to get it replaced with a WD Caviar Black 1.5 TB.

Update: And so now I have "rotating rust" capable of 140 MB/s burst bandwidth... IOPS still sucks :)


#1 Re: My brief experience with SSDs on the desktop

Added on 2011-04-20T16:57 by Jared Barneck

I don't know about the regular SSDs for desktops, but for servers the high end ones are amazing. I would probably agree that you shouldn't waste time or money getting one for a desktop.

For a server, you should drop any drive with a disk and go with a Fusion-IO or if you can't afford the high price, go with a slightly not as good but quite a bit cheaper OCZ RevoDrive:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820227661


We have one of each here at work and they made significant improvements.

Jared Barneck

http://www.rhyous.com

#2 Re: My brief experience with SSDs on the desktop

Added on 2011-04-25T09:11 by Chris

I have an intel X25-M SSD in my Windows 7 desktop here and the performance is definietly noticable. And the high end SLC Intel SSDs in my database server made such a huge difference over the 15k sas drives they replaced.

#3 Re: My brief experience with SSDs on the desktop

Added on 2011-04-26T23:12 by vermaden
I have (not so) recently switched from 7200 RPM 2.5 drive in my laptop into Intel X25-M SSD, after all great 'reviews' from my buddies that use Windows 7 I expected miracles from that change, but I must say that it wasnt all that fast at all, yes i was a little faster, IOPS (espesially find/chmod/chown were instant), but besides that everything runs comparable to the HDD drive, maybe ZFS that I use on FreeBSD has too much space for cache for SSD to have such big advantage ;) Would I take SSD 'trip' again? No. I would get 1TB 2.5 5400 drive to have much more space for ISO images and VirtualBox disks for machines ;)

comments powered by Disqus